The Absence of Remotely Triggered Seismicity in Japan
نویسندگان
چکیده
Remote dynamic triggering occurred in the western United States and Greece following the following the Denali, Hector Mine, Landers, and Izmit mainshocks in seismically active, largely geothermal areas that experienced shaking from the mainshock typically exceeding 0.2 cm/sec. Because triggered earthquakes are small (often below Mw, 2), investigations of whether remote triggering is a generally occurring phenomena must be concentrated in well-instrumented locations. As a seismically active, geothermal, well-instrumented location, Japan constitutes an ideal location for such study. We systematically examine whether remote dynamic triggering occurs following mainshocks in Japan producing amplitudes in the study region above 0.2 cm/sec at distances greater than two estimated fault lengths, from 1998 to 2004. We use both catalog data and filtered waveforms to search for seismicity increases. One significant regional increase follows a Mw 7.6 mainshock in March 2000, largely due to a volcanic swarm that began the day before and increased in intensity in the following days. Two localized increases in cataloged seismicity occur in Kyushu, which is the only area in the study region with onshore tectonic extension. Two factors possibly inhibit regional triggering in Japan: (1) compressional tectonics, and (2) the frequent occurrence of large mainshocks. The ambient seismicity in Japan combined with the lack of observable widespread triggering renders rate-state friction and stress corrosion to be improbable triggering mechanisms. Fracture unclogging as a triggering mechanism is consistent with the observations.
منابع مشابه
Remote triggering of seismicity at Japanese volcanoes following the 2016 M7.3 Kumamoto earthquake
The MJMA7.3 Kumamoto earthquake occurred on April 16, 2016, in the western part of Kyushu, at a depth of 12 km, on an active strike-slip fault. Here, we report on a relatively widespread activation of small remote earthquakes, which occurred as far as Hokkaido, detected by analyzing the continuous waveform data recorded at seismic stations all over Japan. Such relatively widespread remote seism...
متن کاملAn investigation into the remote triggering of the Oita earthquake by the 2016 Mw 7.0 Kumamoto earthquake using full wavefield simulation
High-amplitude seismic waves from the Mw 7.0 Kumamoto earthquake of April 16, 2016, triggered another large earthquake 80 km to the NE roughly 30 s later. The source was located at shallow depths beneath the Yufuin geothermal field, Oita Prefecture, Japan, and the event magnitude was approximately 5.9. To date, this is one of the clearest known examples of a remotely triggered large earthquake....
متن کاملLocally and remotely triggered aseismic slip on the central San Jacinto Fault near Anza, CA, from joint inversion of seismicity and strainmeter data
We study deep aseismic slip along the central section of the San Jacinto Fault, near the Anza Seismic Gap, in southern California. Elevated strain-rates following the remote Mw7.2 April 4, 2010 El Mayor-Cucapah and the local Mw5.4, July 7, 2010 Collins Valley earthquakes were recorded by Plate Boundary Observatory borehole strain-meters near Anza, and were accompanied by vigorous aftershock seq...
متن کاملChanges in geyser eruption behavior and remotely triggered seismicity in Yellowstone National Park produced by the 2002 M 7 . 9 Denali fault earthquake , Alaska
Following the 2002 M 7.9 Denali fault earthquake, clear changes in geyser activity and a series of local earthquake swarms were observed in the Yellowstone National Park area, despite the large distance of 3100 km from the epicenter. Several geysers altered their eruption frequency within hours after the arrival of large-amplitude surface waves from the Denali fault earthquake. In addition, ear...
متن کاملRecurrent seismicity in Rajasthan State in the tectonically stable NW Indian Craton
Indian peninsular region comprises several Archean cratonic blocks (Dharwar, Bastar, Singhbhum, Aravalli – Bundelkhand), bordered by Proterozoic mobile belts. Therefore, this region is considered as tectonically stable and designated as the least vulnerable region to earthquake hazard except the still active Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ). The latter is a major suture between southern and ...
متن کامل